On Friday evening, 16-time International Collection of Poker (WSOP) bracelet winner Phil Hellmuth made a questionable play throughout a televised hand that ignited fireplace within the poker neighborhood and has already been dubbed “the worst hand Phil Hellmuth ever played.”
That hand, which happened throughout Event #9: $25,000 No-Limit Hold’em on the 2022 US Poker Open, and the poker neighborhood’s next response are topics of the newest version of The Muck.
The Hand That Broke Poker Twitter
Throughout five-handed play with blinds at 30,000/60,000/60,000, Alex Foxen opened to 125,000 off a stack of three.2 million. Hellmuth, it seems that sensing weak spot from his opponent, made a transfer from the massive blind through three-betting to 350,000 protecting with a stack of 950,000.
Foxen knew what Hellmuth used to be as much as and four-bet jammed to position him all-in for 540,000 extra. Hellmuth, to the marvel of many, didn’t right away fold. As an alternative, he mulled over a choice, which the totally stunned PokerGO commentators mentioned could be “arguably one of the vital worst choices of his poker occupation.”
“No person would name right here,” mentioned Jeff Platt.
“Now not a unmarried particular person,” agreed Brent Hanks. “Completely no one is hanging the remainder of the cash in.”
Hellmuth disagreed and in the long run discovered a choice for his event existence.
“Yeah, I suppose I higher play to win,” he mentioned prior to putting in place the chips.
Hellmuth didn’t need to sweat it lengthy because the flop got here to pair his queen, and the board completed out to fortify Hellmuth to journeys and stay him alive.
“He is being rewarded for this!” Hanks seen with bewilderment.
Foxen went on to finish in third place for $220,500, while Hellmuth took second for $315,000 after falling to Erik Seidel during heads-up play. Hellmuth was indeed awarded.
‘Torching’ Call or ‘White Magic?’
The tournament commentators were not the only ones shocked by Hellmuth’s questionable call. From the top high-stakes crushers down, every near poker player with a Twitter account appeared to have an opinion on “The Poker Brat’s” play.
“Here is why the (Hellmuth) 3b and call off with Q4o wasn’t as bad as it looks,” tweeted Jason Koon, quickly following up with another tweet consisting of two words: “Just kidding.”
1/6 a thread. Here is why the @phil_hellmuth 3b and call off with Q4o wasn’t as bad as it looks.
“‘Guess I better play to win’ he says hahaha,” tweeted poker streamer Lex Veldhuis. “Mate, if you want to play to win you’d best just stay home.”
‘Guess I better play to win’ he says hahaha. Mate, if you want to play to win you’d best just stay home. https://t.co/MVOcsVQU49
Fellow poker streamer Kevin Martin got in on the fun by tweeting a hand chart showing a range of pockets aces through pocket jacks, ace-king and, off toward the bottom, queen-four offsuit.
“Hey guys, I found (Hellmuth’s) 3 bet call range for value,” Martin tweeted.
Hey guys I found @phil_hellmuth’s 3 bet call range for value. https://t.co/LJr0VCbO98
Yet another poker streamer had something to say about Hellmuth’s call.
“Everyone’s gonna be 3betting the Q4o on Sunday aren’t they?” Ben “Spraggy” Spragg chimed in.
Some social media users asked PokerCoaching.com’s Jonathan Little for his thoughts on the hand, which the poker coach was happy to provide.
“Multiple people have asked me to analyze this hand. It is simple. Trips > Two Pair,” Little dryly tweeted.
Multiple people have asked me to analyze this hand. It is simple. Trips > Two Pair https://t.co/o3P7fbgpSr
High-stakes cash pro Phil Galfond may have had the best response as he posted a four-page satire sarcastically explaining why the call was a good play.
We’ve been here before. @phil_hellmuth makes a play that looks ridiculous, and all the poker fans at home – includi… https://t.co/ti2DmmmD0y
“I believe that after observing Alex’s open raise, tank and 4bet jam, Hellmuth knew 3 things: That Alex had a 9 in his hand, that Q4o is a 64.08% favorite (vs. 99,98,97,96), and that everyone at the table was an idiot,” Galfond’s analysis reads. “Still that leaves over a 1 in 3 chance of busting the tournament, and it was clear that Phil agonized over the decision. Many disagree with the call, but I think 64% equity with 2:1 odds is just too much to pass up. The remaining players weren’t that bad.”
You win this one, Mr. Galfond.
A few poker players and social media users jumped to defend the 16-time bracelet winner and noted that he did in fact have the correct odds to make the call with his holding.
“Wasn’t too bad of a call. I know many pros would agree,” said one Twitter user. “He had to call 580k into 1.35 million. He put 380k in already. If Phil puts Alex on Ak or A rag, it’s the correct call.”
@PokerGO Wasn’t too bad of a call. I know many pros would agree. He had to call 580k into 1.35 million. He put 380k… https://t.co/HDSt6Ky1wt
“The call is actually kinda ok, it’s the 3 bet that’s terrible. He 3 bet WAY too much with the wrong kind of hand, but priced himself in for the call if Foxen shoves,” another user noted.
In the meantime, investor and poker fanatic Jason Calacanis, who has played with Hellmuth on “Hellmuth’s House Sport” as a part of Poker After Darkish, defended Hellmuth through suggesting that the play can have broader implications.
“White magic!!! This transfer simply made him $1.7m in the house recreation,” Calacanis tweeted.
White magic!!! Cross @phil_hellmuth cross!!! This transfer simply made him $1.7m in the house recreation ## https://t.co/KP1r4lTPhv
But others weren’t falling for the idea that Hellmuth’s unorthodox play was somehow defensible, including none other than second-all-time-money-earner Justin Bonomo.
“Some days I feel rusty and wonder if I still have a decent edge playing poker,” Bonomo tweeted. “Reading poker Twitter… let’s just say today is not one of those days.”
Some days I feel rusty and wonder if I still have a decent edge playing poker
Up and coming grinder Landon Tice tweeted a similar observation: “People saying poker is dead while using an ‘equity chart’ to justify a massively torching Q4o call. God bless.”
People saying poker is dead while using an “equity chart” to justify a massively torching Q4o call.
Hellmuth and Foxen React
After the hand that broke poker Twitter, Hellmuth laughed off criticism of his play and jokingly made an “official announcement” that he had “decided to add Q-4 off suit to my list of ‘Top Ten Hands.’”
Official announcement: after a lot of debate, reflection, and careful study, I have decided to add Q-4 off suit to… https://t.co/lvSk8oa6eq
Hellmuth also doubled down a bit by retweeting charts and videos defending the call.
Foxen, meanwhile, who showed little emotion or reaction after taking the beat, appeared less amused than Hellmuth.
“Had been on a twitter hiatus and then log on today to see people non ironically defending Q4o as a reasonable 3b/c candidate 16bb eff,” Foxen tweeted, accompanied with a GIF of an animal entering a room and immediately leaving.
Had been on a twitter hiatus and then log on today to see people non ironically defending Q4o as a reasonable 3b/c… https://t.co/poW9oRzDZg
Any poker players looking to freshen up their big blind three-betting skills can check out this handy PokerNews article on when to position in that further lift.